|
September 2004
Busted: World Trade Watchdog Declares EU & US Farm Subsidies Illegal
Oxfam has welcomed a ruling at the World Trade
Organisation (WTO) that states that the majority of the subsidies the
EU and US pay their sugar and cotton farmers are illegal.
In two separate cases brought by Brazil and other developing nations,
the EU and US have been found guilty of paying subsidies that encourage
overproduction and allow the dumping of excess farm produce overseas,
which undermines the livelihoods of poor farmers in the third world.
“These rulings are a triumph for developing
countries and a warning bell for rich countries who consistently flout
the rules at the WTO and whose unfair systems are creating misery and
poverty for millions” said Phil Bloomer, Head of Oxfam International's
Make Trade Fair Campaign.
“Developing countries have won the moral battle, the intellectual
battle and now the legal battle. This is a signal that the modus operandi
of the rich and powerful in the WTO getting away with anything they like
will no longer be tolerated.”
The cotton panel found that $3.2 billion in US cotton
subsidies and $1.6 billion in export credits (for cotton and other commodities)
are against WTO rules. This represents almost all cotton subsidies and
close to 50% of all export credits used by the USA in 2002.
The sugar panel found the EU is violating its commitments to the WTO
by exporting up to four times more subsidised sugar onto world markets
than is allowed.
Phil Bloomer added: “The EU and US are proven
to be in the wrong. They must now immediately act on the panels' recommendations
and take the necessary steps to reform their unfair regimes. If they do
not they will undermine an organisation that they created and that they
need.”
In each case, the parties will have the opportunity
to appeal against the rulings before the deadline for implementation next
year. Oxfam is urging the countries not to appeal but to implement them
quickly and in good faith.
We estimate that US cotton dumping cost Africa more
than $300m between 2001 and 2002, while Mozambique, Malawi and Ethiopia
have lost $238m since 2001 as a result of restricted access to Europe's
markets for their sugar.
|